SLA at Fantasia: ‘The Soul Eater’ – Spoiler Free Movie Review

Our coverage of the 2024 Fantasia Film Festival keeps on rolling, rain or shine! Not even an extreme weather warning could keep me and my fellow movie lovers from seeing the French film Mangeur d’Âmes (The Soul Eater)! Also, make sure you’re following us on Instagram and X (formerly Twitter) to keep up with our coverage of the Fantasia Film Festival! When Adriana and I were sorting through the Fantasia program to select movies we wanted to review, I was immediately drawn to Mangeur d’Âmes. Not only did the promotional still (shown at the top of this review) have such a creepy vibe, I was drawn in by the synopsis.  “When violent and gruesome deaths start plaguing a small mountain village, an old legend about a malevolent creature resurfaces.” Say no more, I’m in! The movie was also screened with the short film Reel which I will review as part of a roundup of all the shorts I see during Fantasia, so stay tuned for that article coming soon! Anyway, if you’re not as easily convinced as I am, I will go beyond the synopsis a bit to paint a clearer (but still spoiler-free) picture. This is very much along the lines of a police procedural but with some pretty graphic violence and scenes of gore. This also is a bit heavier and darker narratively than I was really expecting so if you’re sensitive to very real and uncomfortable crimes, this might not be an easy watch for you. With that said, these crimes in particular aren’t shown, just mentioned, if that makes it a bit easier for you.   So with some of the details out of the way, was The Soul Eater a feast of a movie or did it leave me hungry for more? My Thoughts This movie really surprised me! It was definitely a bit of an unknown for me as I wasn’t familiar with either of the directors (Julien Maury and Alexandre Bustillo) or their previous works. This was the movies’ North American premiere, so it had some buzz already coming out of earlier screenings so I figured I would give it a try. After digesting the movie a bit more, there was a lot that I liked a lot about it, and a few things that didn’t quite work for me. The movie pairs us up almost instantly with our two main leads, Elisabeth Guardiano played by Virginie Ledoyen, and Captain of the Gendarmerie (a branch of the French military that has law enforcement duties within France) Franck De Rolan played by Paul Hamy. While they fit some cliches from other police procedurals, I found both of the leads to be incredibly strong here. Both have more to them that you learn as the film progresses, but each actor portrays their characters so well, particularly Paul Hamy. This unorthodox pairing is only enhanced by the chemistry between the two actors as they settle into the investigation together. The supporting cast are all very serviceable, but none really stuck out to me except for some of the child performances which were very solid! I also really enjoyed some of the more technical aspects of this movie as well. There were some beautiful shots, especially of the mountainside and of the community where the movie takes place. Apparently the directing pair of Maury and Bustillo have worked mostly in horror and that definitely shows when it came to the gore effects and some more suspenseful scenes in the movie. The gore ranged from comical to downright wince-worthy but in every case the effects were done incredibly well and almost entirely practical which brings things to the next level and helped make the movie feel more grounded.  Sticking with the gore for a moment, there was a scene that stood out in particular to me that was shown later in the movie that was downright unsettling to watch. I can’t elaborate too much without risking spoilers, but it was one of the most unique killing scenes I’ve ever seen in a movie. As someone that watches a ton of movies, I get very excited when I get to see something new and different, and that was definitely the case here. It even had me wincing and that doesn’t happen often to me in movies anymore!  Also, if you’ve ever watched a police procedural before, there’s always at least one scene where our leads head to a bar somewhere and throw back some whiskey and beers after a particularly hard time. We get the same thing in this movie a couple of times, but what stood out to me was that these cops are wine drinkers! Now, this had absolutely no bearing on my impression of the movie, but I did laugh when I realized this after the second such scene where our cops are drinking together. I guess French cops, no matter how traumatized by work, still have a bit of class when it comes to their drinking habits.  Unfortunately, I had a few minor gripes with the narrative, but it was nothing that derailed the movie for me. The movie plays with the local horror story aspect well and doesn’t abuse it as a way to misdirect the audience. Also, as the mystery unfolds and becomes more clear, I feel a little bit unsatisfied with some of the answers it gives. There’s one particular mystery character that we only see glimpses of until they are eventually revealed to be little more than a clumsy way to add a piece to the mystery, and an unsatisfying one at that.  The movie also doesn’t do much new in terms of the structure of the police procedural, but there are some reveals that I really enjoyed. The movie also has a few moments where there are things you see or hear that you know mean something, even if you’re not sure what they mean at the time. However, even if I found some twists and reveals to be really telegraphed, the movie doesn’t

SLA at Fantasia: ‘The Soul Eater’ – Spoiler Free Movie Review Read More »

SLA at Fantasia: Dark Match – Spoiler Free Review

When I first confirmed that I would be covering the Fantasia Film Festival this year, there were two movies I knew for sure that I wanted to see. The first was Chris Stuckmann’s Shelby Oaks (you can read my spoiler free review of that right here) and the other was the focus of this review: Lowell Dean’s Dark Match.  If movies are my first love, wrestling is a close second. Luckily for me, Dark Match brings these two things together! As if that wasn’t enough, this also is a Canadian production loaded with Canadian talent. That includes writer/director Lowell Dean (Wolfcop), current All Elite Wrestling (AEW) star Chris Jericho, Ayisha Issa, and Steven Ogg (Grand Theft Auto V, Better Call Saul, The Walking Dead). Dark Match is a horror action-thriller that takes place in the 1980s. The plot synopsis reads: “A small-time wrestling company accepts a well-paying gig in a backwoods town only to learn, too late, that the community is run by a mysterious cult leader with devious plans for their match.” For those of you less versed in the wrestling world than myself, the term “dark match” is used to describe a match that isn’t filmed or televised. Cleverly, it serves an extra purpose given the culty nature of the movie, but I will say at the top here that I was thrilled by the level of detail about wrestling in this movie. During the conversation with the cast and crew after our screening, Chris Jericho even remarked to Lowell Dean that after he read the script, he was so impressed with the details, he thought he wrote it himself!  But rest assured, this isn’t a movie that relies on you having any real knowledge about wrestling to enjoy. Much of the cast and even Dean himself noted that they weren’t immersed in wrestling before they started making the movie. The idea came to Dean after a friend brought him to a wrestling show in Canada, and he found himself fully immersed in what he was watching and seeing just how passionate the rest of the audience was. They had so much passion, in fact, Dean noted it felt “cult like,” and thus, Dark Match was born!  The theatre was packed, the crowd was energized, and a ton of the cast and crew were here for the world premiere at Fantasia. If you want to follow all of our coverage of the festival, be sure to follow us on Instagram and X (formerly Twitter)! So was Dark Match main event material or was watching it like taking an elbow from the top rope? My Thoughts Not only is this main event material, it’s championship worthy because this movie was an absolute blast from start to finish! I can’t imagine anything I see during the rest of Fantasia will be as fun as this movie was. Let’s start off with the cast, because just wow. Everyone was fantastic here and not one person felt out of place. The pleasant surprise for me was getting to see Canadian actress Ayisha Issa for the first time. She plays Miss Behave (I will be using kayfabe names only in this review 😎), and she was absolutely stupendous. When you have stars like Chris Jericho and Steven Ogg in your movie, it can be to the detriment of your movie if the rest of the cast can’t match what they can bring to it. That definitely wasn’t a problem for Issa, who was so great and so likable that I missed her whenever she wasn’t on screen. She was a captivating lead and played a variety of different sides of Miss Behave, and I hope to see her in more things after this.  Steven Ogg was another beaming high point of this movie. Like most of you, I became familiar with Ogg for his portrayal of Trevor in Grand Theft Auto V. He was easily the best performance in a game full of them and I was ecstatic to see him pop up a few times in Better Call Saul as well. He’s just so captivating on screen, and while his characters in those works aren’t exactly pillars of their community, this was my first time seeing a more human side of Ogg. Ironically, he plays “Mean” Joe Lean in Dark Match, but this really is a case of kayfabe as outside the ring, Joe Lean is a very sweet and nice guy. Also, one small note, every single time I heard his name in the movie, I kept thinking of the song “Jolene” by Dolly Parton. After the screening, Lowell Dean confirmed that was absolutely intentional because when he was a kid he thought the song was about a man named Joe Lean.  I also want to acknowledge the rest of the supporting cast as well, because they all did a fantastic job too. Leo Fafard, Jonathan Cherry, Michael Eklund, Sara Canning, and Mo Adan, who got some of the loudest pops in the entire movie.  Last, but certainly not least, let’s talk about Chris Jericho! Jericho is known for having one of the longest and most consistent runs in wrestling history, and I was intrigued by his casting for this movie. Despite having acted in a few different things, Jericho has avoided acting in movies about wrestling. He confirmed as much tonight, but said he signed onto Dark Match, because he believed there was more here than a simple wrestling movie (and boy, is he right about that). Jericho plays The Prophet, the leader of the mysterious cult that brings our wrestlers out to the middle of nowhere for a show. Jericho is used very well here, as his presence becomes more prominent as the movie progresses. While he clearly enjoys hamming it up, he also gets some moments to be a bit more serious as well. Jericho later pointed out something I noticed and appreciated while watching the movie: he deliberately avoided performing the moves that the real Jericho typically does in

SLA at Fantasia: Dark Match – Spoiler Free Review Read More »

SLA at Fantasia: Shelby Oaks – Spoiler Free Movie Review

If you’ve ever talked to me about movies, chances are I have brought up a person whose videos I’ve watched on YouTube religiously for around fourteen years. That person is Chris Stuckmann. On a basic level, Chris and I shared the same taste in movies, but it was more his approach to talking about movies that really pulled me in. More than anything, Chris was a fan of movies first and foremost, and it was the passion above all else that has made me a long-time subscriber to his YouTube channel.  In fact, it was Chris’s approach that inspired the very website you’re reading now. I started Screen Love Affair because I love movies and I wanted to share that feeling with the world. Like Chris, I wanted to put that passion out there with the hope that someone will discover a new movie that inspires them, because they read about it here.  For Chris, though, talking about movies wasn’t enough. He has been a filmmaker since he was a kid and, as executive producer Mike Flanagan said tonight at the world premiere of Shelby Oaks, it was obvious that Chris would be here someday.  I was able to attend the world premiere of Shelby Oaks as part of the coverage we’ve been doing of the 2024 Fantasia International Film Festival in Montreal. We got to hear from Mike Flanagan, who was also there to introduce Chris before the movie. The cast and crew in attendance stuck around for a Q&A afterwards as well. If you’d like to see that and our coverage of the rest of the Fantasia Film Festival, be sure to follow us on Instagram and X (formerly Twitter)! Shelby Oaks is a mystery-horror movie written, directed, and produced by Chris Stuckmann. The film stars Camille Sullivan as Mia, Brendan Sexton III as Mia’s husband Robert, Michael Beach as Detective Burch, Robin Bartlett as Norma, Keith David as Morton Jacobson, and Sarah Durn as Mia’s sister Riley.  As for the plot, I’ll only provide you with a fraction of the synopsis because I think it gives you more than enough detail to know what kind of movie to expect: “Mia frantically searches for her sister Riley, after Riley ominously disappeared in the last taping of a show by a group of paranormal investigators called the Paranormal Paranoids.” Before we get into the review itself, rest assured that like all of my reviews, this will be SPOILER FREE. Also, for full disclosure, I was a backer on the Shelby Oaks Kickstarter campaign. I have no financial stake in the movie or anything, but when Chris announced the Kickstarter, it was important for me to give something back to the person that had given me so much for so many years. So, without further ado, let’s get Stuckmannized!  My Thoughts To state it right at the top, I’m thrilled to report that this was a strong feature film debut for Chris Stuckmann! There was plenty of buzz and excitement around this one, especially amongst the sold out theatre in Montreal that came to watch the premiere.  The performances were great all around, but the real standout here is the lead performance by Camille Sullivan. The whole movie rests on her shoulders and she does a fantastic job conveying the grief and the hope that her character carries throughout the movie. Another standout for me was Robin Bartlett as Norma. She had the entire theatre in the palm of her hand for every second she was on screen and was a genuine delight to watch. Sticking with what I liked, Stuckmann’s direction was probably the biggest highlight of the whole thing for me. There was a confidence I could feel throughout the movie with almost every shot. Stuckmann isn’t just a fan of horror movies, he’s a student of the game, and he knows how to use the frame and audio to create specific feelings of dread in the audience. Even I, as a seasoned horror veteran, found myself getting drawn into these moments and experiencing some genuine scares. When I anticipated a jump scare approaching, Stuckmann would linger a beat or two longer than most horror movies. This restraint causes just an extra notch of suspense that really goes a long way when it comes to building and then releasing tension.  To contrast the horror, though, this movie is also really funny. There were plenty of laughs to be had, not in the form of annoying quips or forced jokes, but in recognizing the humour that can only be found in the horror genre. Oftentimes in horror movies, there are certain moments that are so absurd that you can’t help but laugh. Shelby Oaks succeeds where most horror movies fail in this regard, because it recognizes the humour in those moments, while lesser movies insist on trying to make the absurd scary, which causes a disconnect with the audience.  Another highlight was just the perspective of the movie itself. I won’t give anything away, but this was one of the best and most unique aspects of the movie. In a genre as populated as horror, it’s always impressive to me when you can do something new, and that’s what Stuckmann was able to do here.  When it came to the sound, I was a little more mixed. One of the things that really takes me out of a tense scene in a horror movie is when I notice the audio drop out completely. It’s not just a subconscious thing that makes it easier for me to pay attention to every little sound, it makes me acutely aware of the fact that something loud is going to appear on the screen suddenly. I lose all sense of tension as I sit there simply waiting for that thing to happen. When it comes to the sound mixing and design, I find a more subtle approach, with a very limited score throughout, keeps me a little less aware and prepared for

SLA at Fantasia: Shelby Oaks – Spoiler Free Movie Review Read More »

SLA at Fantasia: ‘The Count of Monte Cristo’ (2024) – Movie Review

If you haven’t already seen the memo (or read Adriana’s great review to kick off our coverage), we’re going to be covering the Fantasia Film Festival this year! We will have tons of reviews for you in the coming weeks, but we encourage you to follow us on Instagram and X (formerly Twitter) for more regular updates about what we’re up to during the festival. With that out of the way, I started my Fantasia adventure off with Le Comte de Monte-Cristo (The Count of Monte Cristo). This is a 2024 French period action-thriller film based on the 1844 novel of the same name by Alexandre Dumas. This adaptation was written and directed by the duo of Matthieu Delaporte and Alexandre de La Patellière. For anyone unfamiliar with the source material (like I was), the movie starts in France in the year 1815. Edmond Dantès, played spectacularly by Pierre Niney, is ever so briefly on top of the world before he comes tumbling down through treachery and betrayal. Revenge, though, is one hell of a motivator and another twist of fate may just make that revenge possible. One interesting note too is that the budget for this film was reportedly €42.9 million (about $46.7 million USD), which makes it the most expensive French film of the year! So, with that out of the way, did I start my Fantasia 2024 experience off with a bang or a whimper? My Thoughts This was a definite BANG and one hell of a way to start off the Fantasia Film Festival! First of all, this movie played like a superhero movie at the screening I was at. To see the same level of reactions to a French language period piece as I did when I saw Avengers: Infinity War or Avengers: Endgame was an unexpected but hilarious treat. I’m pretty sure the crowd popped harder when Dantès called himself “Le Comte de Monte-Cristo” for the first time than when Captain America yelled for the Avengers to assemble. To bring you even more into my experience at my first Fantasia screening, if you’ve never been to one before, it’s common for people in the crowd to meow like cats before the movie starts and cheer loudly for the Nongshim Noodle commercial. Check out this Reddit thread to learn more about the origins of those traditions. Anyway, let’s dig into the actual movie itself, because there was a lot to really like here! First of all, that big budget was used well, because the movie looked fantastic. Locations and sets were amazing, the costumes were fantastic, and the makeup (which is key to the plot) was also superb. In conversations I’ve had with people about films made outside of the US or Hollywood system, there is often a concern that they’re cheaper or of lesser quality as a result, and that absolutely isn’t the case. There was nothing I saw that made this movie feel amateurish and, as a matter of fact, it puts a lot of modern Hollywood movies to shame. The entire cast here was phenomenal too. Aside from Pierre Niney, who I’ve already mentioned, the movie also stars Bastien Bouillon, Anaïs Demoustier, Laurent Lafitte, Vassili Schneider, and Anamaria Vartolomei. While everyone was great, of particular note to me was Vassili Schneider, who had a charm and look that reminded me a lot of Timothee Chalamet (sorry, Abby). We’re not given any reason to dislike his character other than his association with the targets of Dantès’ vengeance, but the story needs us to like this character for it to work. Thankfully Schneider was so charming and likable as Albert that he really becomes the sole embodiment of pure love, while being surrounded by people motivated by greed or hate. There was one scene in particular towards the middle of the film where the rest of the main cast gets to shine, and it was one of the best scenes I’ve seen all year! Without giving details away, the Count is regaling his dinner guests with a supposed ghost story that hits a little close to home for some of his guests while others are fully engaged with giddy excitement. Every single actor in the scene has to do something unique and specific, and you can’t help but laugh at the reactions of each character. It was truly a standout scene in a movie filled with a ton of great moments. Another thing I want to cover is the score. The score fit the movie well, and when it became more prominent in certain moments, it definitely worked, but I didn’t feel too strongly about this aspect of the movie. For what it’s worth though, I’m not the most musically inclined person in the world, so scores really only tend to stand out to me when they’re more noticeable in movies like Oppenheimer or Past Lives, to give you a couple examples from last year. Sticking with audio, the sound design was another big highlight, specifically during the action sequences. The movie isn’t full of constant action by any means, but every action scene feels impactful. This isn’t something most people are aware of when they watch a movie, but the power of sound design in action is massive, even if you don’t notice it. For example, imagine you’re watching a movie where someone falls off the roof of a three story building and when they land on the ground, you don’t hear any sound. The result is that despite your eyes seeing a great fall, you don’t really feel like it was a great fall. I didn’t even realize how bad most movies are in this regard until I saw this one, because absolutely every gunshot, punch, or fall is something you hear and feel. The movie doesn’t come close to the flash of what you’ll find in the John Wick movies (nor does it want to), but you absolutely feel every single hit and that is incredibly important for selling an

SLA at Fantasia: ‘The Count of Monte Cristo’ (2024) – Movie Review Read More »

SLA at Fantasia: Carnage for Christmas – Movie Review

We’re kicking off the Fantasia International Film Festival with a self-described “transgender holiday film,” directed and co-written by Alice Maio Mackay. There’s nothing like a good Christmas slasher in the middle of a humid Montreal July to offer a little bit of escapism. Carnage for Christmas is the first film in Fantasia’s ‘Underground’ lineup in 2024, which highlights “bold, super independent outsider works that possess a purity of vision and are wholly unafraid to take risks”. It’s also the first film of Mackay’s that I’ve seen, but, shockingly, considering the Australian filmmaker is just 19 years old, it’s her fifth feature. To be this prolific—and this creatively fearless—at just 19 is both awe-inspiring and more than a little envy-inducing. I didn’t know exactly what I was expecting going in, but with a title like Carnage for Christmas, and a throwback-style poster evoking the iconic Black Christmas (1974), I knew I was probably in for a fun time. And that’s exactly what I got! The film follows Lola, forensic investigator and host of a true crime podcast, who returns to her hometown for Christmas for the first time since running away and transitioning. Upon her return, bodies start to pile up, as her own past and the town’s dark history rear their heads. The holiday vibes are relatively minimal, especially at first. I’m also used to snow-white Christmases here in Canada, so the Australian setting didn’t exactly help to put me in the Christmas spirit. But, despite the lack of snow, we still get a fun holiday twist to the usual slasher tropes and imagery that makes the film effectively campy and creepy. In general, the movie is a bit slow to start, and the resolution felt somewhat rushed to me. But with a scant 70-minute runtime, that’s no surprise, and Mackay still manages to fit a lot into those 70 minutes, from fairly well-realized characters and relationships to small town lore to a whole animated sequence (!) that quickly and impressively conveys our protagonist’s relevant traumatic backstory. And honestly, by the time a drag queen is using her tits as a weapon, I was quite on board with the whole endeavor, despite the film’s flaws. Without spoiling too much, the ending, rushed as it was, felt redemptive and cathartic in a way that I think a lot of queer folks will appreciate. Don’t get me wrong here—for all its messaging, this is also a bloody, expletive-filled slasher. There’s some good use of practical effects, as well as some sharp lines of dialogue and moments of humour that work quite well. The performances, while at times a bit stiff, are also surprisingly good, especially from Jeremy Moineau, who plays Lola and has the difficult task of carrying the entire film and, as far as I can tell, hasn’t acted in anything else before. To that point, you can definitely tell the movie is low-to-no budget, but it’s what I would call “charmingly low budget”. It’s polished enough that the low-budget aspects don’t really detract from the experience, and more importantly, it’s clear that Mackay has an assured vision and presence as a director. With editing and visual effects by Vera Drew (whose film The People’s Joker released in the US earlier this year to critical acclaim), Carnage has a sense of visual flair and confidence that feels rare for a movie at this level. It also feels like a truly collaborative movie. From what I gather, a lot of the cast and crew here are people Mackay has worked with before, and it has the feeling of a group of friends coming together to create something they’re passionate about and have fun doing it, which is something I always appreciate and adore in a movie. Ultimately, we need more trans voices and filmmakers, especially in subversive genres like horror, where they’ve historically been either victimized or villainized. So I’m happy to say that, while the edges are rough and not every swing lands, this is a welcome entry into the queer underground Christmas horror canon. Verdict With a brisk runtime, a distinct sense of style, and some solid performances—all on a very low budget—this is a fun, campy, holiday slasher. While I wasn’t blown away by anything here, Carnage for Christmas shows a lot of promise. If this is what Alice Maio Mackay can do at 19 on a nothing budget, then I can’t wait to see what she’s capable of with even more to work with. And if she continues at this pace, she’ll be a household name in horror in no time.

SLA at Fantasia: Carnage for Christmas – Movie Review Read More »

Spoiler Free Movie Review Roundup: MaXXXine, Hit Man, The Bikeriders, & More

Adriana and I have been watching more movies than we can write full reviews for, so it’s time for our second ever Review Roundup! These will be shorter than our typical reviews, but will still give you enough information to gauge whether these movies are worth checking out or not.  Also, stay tuned for individual reviews for I Saw the TV Glow and Furiosa from Adriana and Thelma and Longlegs from me!  Anyways, these movies will appear in order from least enjoyable to the most enjoyable for me. Let’s dive in! The Fall Guy So flat out, I really disliked this movie. It had a good cast and a solid budget but I was less than enthusiastic about the rest of the team. Helming this movie was David Leitch. The best thing Leitch has done as a director was when he co-directed the first John Wick movie with Chad Stahelski. Since they parted ways, Stahelski has continued to make John Wick movies that, at least in my opinion, have consistently gotten better with each entry. Leitch on the other hand has made, what I consider, to be perfectly forgettable slop that you may enjoy enough when you watch it, but you’ll never think of again. The writer didn’t do much to excite me either, as his credits include movies like Hobbs & Shaw and Iron Man 3.  This is a movie about a stuntman and is supposed to be a love letter to stunt performers. I will take a quick second here to note that the Academy Awards still do not have a category for stunt performers and this is an egregious omission considering the history and importance of stunt work to cinema. However, what Leitch clearly lacks as a director when compared to Stahelski is the ability to really make stunts in his movies shine. I know from clips that there was significant stunt work required for this movie, but they can’t help but make it look and feel as bland and fake as possible.  The real tragedy of this movie though for me is the wasted potential. When it comes to top-tier action cinema these days, it’s coming from the team behind the Mission: Impossible and John Wick films like Tom Cruise, Keanu Reeves, Christopher McQuarrie, and Chad Stahelski. I would much rather have seen people like them given this budget and cast to make a movie that’s supposed to be a love letter to stunt performers. At least in their hands it would have been pleasant to look at and fun to watch, none of which this movie was.  Verdict I will acknowledge that I might be a bit of a “hater” on this and general audiences that did turn out for this seemed to enjoy it more. I really did want to like this one, but there just was nothing noteworthy or special here for me. When Ryan Gosling isn’t even able to make your movie good, that’s a big problem. You may have more fun with this movie than I did, but you won’t remember it after you watch it and there are plenty of better movies out there if you’re looking to kill a couple hours. Arcadian This was another one Ty and I watched together because it featured one of our all time favourite actors, Nicolas Cage. Unfortunately, this one falls into the more forgettable of the bunch. There really isn’t much here to enjoy beyond the creature designs, which are admittedly pretty cool. The child actors are fine too, but I just never got really invested in anything that was happening.  The biggest issue for me though is that typically in movies like this, Cage is able to elevate the experience so you can at least have a fun time. Without spoiling anything, Cage is not given much time throughout the movie to do a whole lot. His role could have been played by anyone and the experience would be the same and that should never be true about a role played by Nicolas Cage. Verdict You can definitely skip this one. The reason it doesn’t get a worse score is because this is a really small movie that has at least some redeeming factors, including the creature designs and the serviceable performances. I wanted to like this one more, there just wasn’t enough of anything there for me to really sink my teeth into. The Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare Have you ever wondered what Inglorious Basterds would be like if it was worse in every conceivable way? Well wonder no more, because this is the movie for you! Does this mean the movie is bad though? Not exactly.  Now sure, it’s really unfair to compare this to Quentin Tarantino’s Inglourious Basterds, but if you do watch this you will be blown away by just how similar they are narratively. It even has one of the actors from Basterds as the main bad guy in the film! However, if you can let that go, this is a perfectly fine movie. There is a big ensemble cast here including the likes of Henry Cavill and Alan Ritchson who were the standouts here for sure.  The movie never really aspires to be more than it is and that’s definitely to its benefit. Nothing really stands out as particularly memorable or exceptional, but there are some fun action scenes and good chemistry from the main cast.  Verdict It’s definitely not my favourite Guy Ritchie movie, in fact it’s not even close, but if you just need to throw something on that is fun and you don’t mind it being forgettable, you can do a lot worse than watching Cavill and Ritchson slaughtering some Nazis! Horizon: An American Saga – Chapter 1 Oh boy, where do I start with this one? I guess it makes sense to properly set your expectations. This is perhaps the most “part one” movie ever. To provide a score here is difficult because this is not a complete movie in

Spoiler Free Movie Review Roundup: MaXXXine, Hit Man, The Bikeriders, & More Read More »

Challengers – Movie Review

Sports have never really been my thing, but I’ve always loved tennis. I’ve been watching it since I was about 11 years old, and though I don’t follow it religiously these days, it still holds a special place in my heart. So when I heard that Luca Guadagnino was making a sexy tennis movie starring Zendaya, I perked up. Notable tennis movies are few and far between (Wimbledon and Battle of the Sexes are the only two that immediately come to mind), but I don’t think any have captured the sport quite like Challengers does. I’ll say right up front: this is a weird movie. If you’re going in expecting a straightforward love triangle rom-com on the tennis courts, you might be disappointed. The movie is centred around a single tennis match at a ‘challenger’ tournament in New Rochelle, NY. A low-stakes tournament in the scheme of things but one that ends up charged with the fraught history and relationships of our central trio of characters. Competing for the title are Patrick (Josh O’Connor) and Art (Mike Faist), while Art’s coach and wife (and Patrick’s ex), Tashi (Zendaya), watches from the sidelines. With this simple setup, the movie proceeds to bounce us back and forth in time like a tennis ball, picking up more and more tidbits of the characters’ intertwined past and what led up to this final match. The time jumps can feel a bit chaotic, but I never felt overwhelmed or lost, which is a testament to how great the actors embody their characters at different stages of their lives. All three of the leads are phenomenal, but Zendaya and Josh O’Connor are especially good. It’s hard to believe this is Zendaya’s first time really leading a movie, but boy does she ever lead. As great as Zendaya is in Dune: Part Two (check out Shea’s review here), her role here feels a lot meatier and more complicated, allowing her to really shine in her own right and not just as a love interest to a male protagonist. Ironically, given her character spends a lot of time literally on the sidelines, she’s less sidelined in this movie than she is in films like Dune or the Tom Holland Spider-Man franchise. The way the characters interact is often unspoken. Everything is communicated through looks, glances, gestures. Tennis is a spectator sport. But while everyone watches the players, the players watch each other, so the act of looking holds a lot of power. It’s how you learn about your opponent. We all learn a lot about each other by the way we carry ourselves, our body language. And the film exploits that dynamic and uses perspective to remarkable effect. At one point, Tashi says that “tennis is a relationship” and this right here is the movie’s thesis. In Challengers, tennis is the means through which it examines the relationships between its three central characters. As chaotic as the timeline and filmmaking is, the movie never strays its focus very far from Tashi, Art, and Patrick. It’s as precise as an ace down the line. And that’s why it works so well despite all of its loud, flashy formal elements. But let’s talk about those formal elements for a minute. The filmmaking here is not just incredibly fun and absorbing to watch, but it’s exciting. The camerawork and editing and lighting and music are all operating at an incredibly heightened level—some of the shots and cuts are bonkers, but I couldn’t stop grinning throughout the entire movie because of how kinetic and alive the whole thing feels. I’m talking bold choices that most other filmmakers wouldn’t even think to try, let alone execute so beautifully and effectively. Some of those over-the-top choices are a little too on the nose, and some work better (how many phallic-shaped foods can the boys eat around each other?) than others (a literal storm of emotions), but I found myself enjoying it all nonetheless. The score, by Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross, is a thrumming techno fever-dream, pulsating throughout the movie to give it electricity and life. I don’t often come back to movie soundtracks and just listen to them as I go about my day, but since leaving the theatre, I’ve been listening to the Challengers soundtrack quite a bit, because it makes me feel like I could run a marathon. The marketing for the movie really pushed the love triangle aspect, but this is the rare love triangle in which all three sides of the triangle have sexual chemistry and tension. Art and Patrick both fall head over heels for Tashi after watching her play tennis, but they’re as much in love with each other as they are in love with Tashi. And while Tashi loves the boys, she loves tennis more than she could ever love any one person. She’s a force, and her desire for power and control is matched only by her love of the game—and, consequently, by the omnipresent weight of what she’s lost and can never get back: her ability to play it. It’s this intense tangle of desire and motivation that makes the movie so compelling to watch. For such a sexually charged movie, it’s also notable that none of the sex scenes (or tennis matches, for that matter) ever play out to climax. We’re constantly denied the satisfaction of seeing how things finish, left to infer what happens next. It’s an incredible power move on Guadagnino’s part, but it also makes everything that much sexier. After all, for these characters, foreplay is everything. Sometimes it matters who wins what, but in the end, it’s the dance, the interplay, the unspoken conversation happening from opposite sides of the net, that excites them all. It’s in those rare moments of connection, whether on or off the court, that we can maybe reach something like understanding. Tashi describes it like so: For about fifteen seconds there, we were actually playing tennis, and we understood each other completely. So

Challengers – Movie Review Read More »

Nunday Sunday – The First Omen & Immaculate Reviews

This past Sunday was lovingly dubbed “Nunday Sunday” after a brief workshop between Adriana, Sam, Ty, and myself. Why? Well, because last Sunday we went to the theatre for a double-feature of The First Omen and Immaculate! I figured since I saw them on the same day and they’re far more similar than I expected, I might as well review them together too.  So, were either of these movies a Revelation or did they cause a mass Exodus from the theatre?  The First Omen The first movie on Nunday Sunday was fittingly titled The First Omen. This is a prequel to The Omen (1976). Trying to think back, I don’t think I’ve ever actually seen the original movie, but I did see the remake when I was a kid (thanks Gram). It was so long ago, though that, save for the name of the kid in the original, I didn’t remember anything about it.  Thankfully, though, none of that matters. As a prequel, it doesn’t rely on you having seen the first movie for it to work. How well does it work though? Just well enough to get a positive rating from me! There were at least a couple good scares and tense moments and a little twist that added a nice wrinkle to the story. The real standout to me though was the director, Arkasha Stevenson, and actress Nell Tiger Free, who played the main character Margaret. This was the first feature film for Stevenson, whose capable direction was good enough to take a familiar story and still make it an enjoyable experience. This movie had some style to it that I wouldn’t have expected to see from someone making their first feature film.  Free was also great, playing the various sides of Margaret perfectly. She’s asked to do some tough things in this movie, including a oner towards the end that wouldn’t have worked at all in lesser hands. Free so far in her career has mostly been in TV, but that includes projects with Nicolas Winding Refn (Drive) and M. Night Shyamalan (Unbreakable, The Sixth Sense). I hope to see more of her in the future!  If I had to fault the movie for anything, it’s that it was a tad longer than it needed to be and it covered very familiar territory. There was a clear gap between the end of the movie and the rest of it too, as they did a lot of work to tie things into the first movie. One particular line actually made me laugh out loud because it felt like it belonged in a superhero movie, not this horror movie. Anyway, it wasn’t a bad ending or anything, you could just tell this was all part of the obligatory aspects of the movie being a prequel. Verdict Overall, if you’re looking for some chills and scares at the movies, you can do worse than The First Omen! Immaculate Speaking of things worse than The First Omen, next up we’re talking about Immaculate. The first thing I want to mention was how many beats were the same in both of these movies. It was so absurd that Adriana, Sam, and I were laughing throughout this movie. I’m not really faulting either movie for this, but it was incredibly bizarre and noticeable, especially when watching them back to back.  Unfortunately, this movie suffered from the same issue as The First Omen, in that it was covering very familiar territory, but it lacked any of the redeeming qualities that The First Omen had. The movie just fell flat at nearly every point. The scenes designed to build tension were so poorly put together and all ended very predictably. Narratively, the movie was pretty boring and uninteresting too. Funnily enough, where I think The First Omen could’ve shaved a few minutes off, I think this movie might have benefitted from a bit more of a build. I won’t spoil what happens (though you can glean part of it from the title of the movie), but I actually felt like this revelation happened much too early in the movie. It could have done a better job of creating a more sinister vibe or even adding a few more horror elements. Once this reveal happens, the movie shifts focus a bit and doesn’t do much in the scare or tension departments. With that said, though, nothing I saw really suggested that they would’ve done much good with more sequences, so I’m happy they stuck with the 89 minute runtime.  If you didn’t know, Sydney Sweeney stars as Sister Cecilia (she also produced the movie) and nothing I saw here really changed me feelings on Sweeney as an actress. I haven’t seen all of her work, but in the things I have seen, I’ve always felt she was fine. Both the movie and her performance take a sharp turn in the third act of the movie. It was definitely weird and kind of funny, in a morbid horror movie sort of way, but I thought everything near the end was done much better at the end of The First Omen, including the performances from our main nuns.  Verdict I think you can skip this one. It might be more enjoyable if you don’t watch many horror movies, and the ending was enough to shock some of the younger viewers in my theatre, but it didn’t do anything to excite this seasoned horror veteran. 

Nunday Sunday – The First Omen & Immaculate Reviews Read More »

Love Lies Bleeding – Movie Review

If you’re one of the few people, myself included, who watched and loved Rose Glass’s debut, Saint Maud, then you might have some idea of what you’re walking into with her sophomore feature Love Lies Bleeding. But this is also a very different movie. For one, it isn’t a horror movie (or is it?). It’s a love story (or is it?), wrapped in a pulpy propulsive neo-noir crime thriller. The movie dabbles in a range of genres, deploying tropes and archetypes that we’ve all seen before, but it feels like it’s wearing those generic conventions in a way that I’ve personally never seen before, with characters and body types that don’t typically get featured in genres like this. Set in New Mexico in the late 1980s, the movie follows Kristen Stewart’s mullet-clad, chain-smoking gym manager Lou and Katy O’Brian’s Jackie, an aspiring bodybuilder from Oklahoma who’s just passing through. They meet, fall in love, and, well, things go off the rails. If I tell you any more, it’ll ruin a lot of the fun, so I recommend going in with as little prior knowledge as possible. I’ve been a big fan of Kristen Stewart’s for a while now, and she’s at her nervy, chaotic best here, a livewire set off by lust, loneliness, and anger. Some of her lines and line deliveries are so great and off-the-wall, yet she consistently delivers them in a way that’s fully believable. I was also incredibly impressed with Katy O’Brian in what will likely go down as a breakout role for her. As a former bodybuilder herself, she’s the perfect choice to play Jackie, who goes from free spirit with puppy dog energy to roid-rage-fueled desperation, and O’Brian doesn’t miss a beat—it’s a hell of a performance. Both actors imbue their characters with such visceral physicality, in very different ways, that it’s mesmerizing to watch. And speaking of physicality, the movie is, to quote Shea’s Letterboxd review, “very dirty, grimy, and horny.” It’s intensely focused on bodies—how they move and expand and break and change shape, whether out of love or rage or survival instinct. From montages of sweaty bulging muscles set to 80s synths to the open-mouthed desire with which Lou stares at Jackie to moments of explosive action, it’s a very visceral film. At one point, Lou tells Jackie, “I want to stretch you, see how far you can go.” It’s spoken in a sexual context, of course, but I was struck by just how much the line hits at the core of the movie’s thematic concerns. It could almost serve as the movie’s thesis. The movie is very horny, indeed, but it’s also about the extremes to which people will go for love, the way that love and desire can stretch us out into both the best and worst versions of ourselves, and the lengths to which people will go when they’re in the throes of intoxicating, mind-vacuating emotions like lust and rage. It doesn’t surprise me that Glass is so concerned with bodies (bodies that flex, split, stretch, break, bend, ooze), given her previous film is a horror movie. Horror is one of what Linda Williams calls ‘body genres’, along with melodrama and pornography. These are genres that both represent bodily fluids and simultaneously try to elicit some kind of visceral bodily reaction in their viewers, whether it’s jerking tears, jerking off, or just plain ol’ palm-sweating fear. Loves Lies Bleeding is melodramatic, erotic, and horrifying in equal measure. To me, Glass’s movies, and this one especially, feel emblematic of a new kind of body genre, one that encompasses all the fluidity that bodies have to offer. Love Lies Bleeding is grimy, sexy, gross, and violent. It’s also darkly funny and doesn’t pull any punches. It’s both grounded and fantastical, and somehow makes that all work in a cohesive way. The big swings may not work for everyone, but they never feel unearned. And the craft on display here is undeniable. Glass just has a great visual eye and a great instinct for how to use elements of genre. I found it really interesting to read that on both this movie and Saint Maud, she ended up doing reshoots after realizing what was missing when cutting together a first cut of the movie. I think it’s an approach that more filmmakers should be unafraid to take. You often don’t know what’s missing from a thing until you’re in the room putting it together. That kind of flexibility and willingness to go back and re-adjust is clearly working for her, because both of these movies feel very self-assured in a way that not many first- or even second-time filmmakers can claim. Verdict I can safely say that this movie will not be for everyone, but it felt very particularly made for my tastes. It’s bloody and funny and hot; it’s got guns, girls, and gore; there’s tense action and romance that makes you swoon until it turns twisted and toxic. The movie also looks great, with out-of-this-world visual flourishes and a sick soundtrack. There’s beauty and horror in equal measure here, and if that’s not your jam, then stay clear. Thankfully, it very much is my jam, and I was more than happy to go along for the wild ride.

Love Lies Bleeding – Movie Review Read More »

Hate to Love: Nickelback – Movie Review

Look at this Photograph. Every time I do it makes me laugh. This is Ty and I acting like Animals at the Nickelback concert last year in Montreal. We figured they would Burn it to the Ground, but I don’t think we were ready for just how much fun we would have! I hope that Someday you get the chance to see them live and even if you’re too Far Away from Ty and I to see it together, there’s Gotta Be Somebody that will go with you. We’re not here to talk about the concert though, instead we’re talking about Hate to Love: Nickelback, a documentary that offers a glimpse into the Rockstar life of the band. The documentary takes an interesting approach and talks about how much hate the band received despite their overwhelming success. It really is Too Bad because Ty and I have always tried to understand the haters, and if you’re reading this and are one of them, we’ve never quite Figured You Out. “Why do people spend so much effort Trying Not To Love You?” we’ve often wondered. But what this documentary proves is that When We Stand Together as Nickelback fans, we can drown out the hate.  Ty and I went and saw the movie This Afternoon here in Montreal and we’re ready to tell you if this documentary will Lullaby you to sleep or if you’ll be back for the Next Go Round. My Thoughts Alright, now we’ve gotta get down to business. We’re only giving you a brief break from the song name puns, though, because they’re coming back in the verdict section!  Overall, this was a fun little documentary. Obviously Ty and I are fans of the band, but there was still a lot here to be learned in this movie. The documentary takes time to really focus on every member of the band, including some earlier members that aren’t part of it anymore. Learning more about the origins of Nickelback in Hanna, Alberta Canada was super interesting too, especially as Canadians. Love or hate them, Nickelback is definitely a Canadian success story.  As far as a focus goes, this was very much a documentary that the band was clearly happy to participate in and I think as a result it might not touch on some things in as much detail as some would expect if it was more of an “outside” view of the band. Without giving anything specific away, the documentary acknowledges the party lifestyle from lead singer Chad Kroeger but avoids any crazy stories that might’ve come out of living that life. Any Avril Lavigne fans will be disappointed to know that she is not actually mentioned in any real detail or even by name, except for a few headlines that appear on screen. I do think it would be fair to call this sanitized, but I didn’t feel like it was altering the truth of things either. This very much felt like Nickelback telling their story in their way.  This also is a good time to talk about the title and the theme of the whole thing. It’s been a popular thing in my lifetime to hate on Nickelback and I’m not afraid to admit that I was one of those hypocrites who would say out loud about how lame they are and then blast their music into my ears on my MP3 player back in the day. If I could knock this documentary for one thing, I wish they actually spent more time addressing this phenomenon than they did because it’s part of what makes Nickelback, and their story, so unique. While achieving some of the best commercial success in the history of music, they were also one of the most memed and dunked on bands in history.  I’m no musician and I’m one of the least qualified people in the world to talk about what is “good” music, so I won’t do that here. What I will say though is that there should be nothing wrong with just enjoying something that makes you feel good. I won’t name the person, but on a road trip I was on in the last few years, my brother and I queued up a few Nickelback songs and our travelling companion immediately started with the lines about Nickelback being lame and what not. Not two songs later that same person was singing at the top of their lungs with us as we laughed and formed a fun core memory. And that right there is why I love Nickelback. Their music is just so goddamn catchy and fun and it just begs you to sing along with it.  Hate to Love: Nickelback is a nice little look into the human elements of a band that, even to me as a fan, felt like more of a thing than a group of human beings with their own challenges and lives.  Verdict Overall, this was a fun look into a band that has been inescapable on the airwaves throughout the 21st century. Ty and I both liked this movie, but you don’t need to rush out to see it as If Today Was Your Last Day on earth. What the movie makes clear though is that If Everyone Cared about having a good time as much as they did about being a hater, there wouldn’t be anyone left to hate on Nickelback. If I’m ever in a bad mood and you’re wondering about Savin’ Me from myself, playing some Nickelback is How You Remind Me of what happiness is all about. If you do want to see the movie though and you can’t find someone to watch it with, I’d Come For You because as long as us Nickelback fans have each other, we’re Never Gonna Be Alone.  If you haven’t seen Hate to Love: Nickelback yet, What Are You Waiting For? Head over to the concession stand to get Something in Your Mouth and if after watching it you

Hate to Love: Nickelback – Movie Review Read More »